data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44420/44420353ec00848a00d92e7701cebbd96bfe47b7" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83bad/83bad59a5f3bdcce27b06a18c0fc1505e5f04cad" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0951/f095149666cca060f22426abdc8136e0d061cec5" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/668db/668dba6d8781d4a73de2711de4cdaf604bfd9e5a" alt="Bottom of page" Brady | Monday, December 16, 2002 - 03:18 pm data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59974/59974fc7fa7745e0f218bbdd2c652939b1330c13" alt="Click here to edit this post" After reading through the priciples, am I to understand that there are no public defenders and that all legal defense would necessarily be at the defendant's expense? If so, I'm interested in how a bankrupt defendant would receive a proper defense? Surely the judge presiding cannot take it upon himself to investigate the case, secure witnesses, obtain evidence, and build a case for the defendant? Wouldn't the cost of public defenders be a legitimate use of public money assuming it is included in the citizenship covenant? In such a covenant, the prospective citizen agrees to waive his rights and submit to a national draft, possible jury duty, and to various taxes. I know that I personally would be even more willing to become a citizen if it meant having legal defense provided me should I need it and be unable to pay for it. |