| Subtopic | Msgs | Last Updated | |
| The UN and Property Rights | - | |
| The UN in your backyard | - | |
| The UN in our National Parks | - | |
| The Next Great Land Grab | - | |
| Burn your cabin, or go to jail | - |
     | Tuesday, May 29, 2001 - 09:41 am  Depopulating the Red Areas As discussed above, there has long been a globalist/UN initiative to make large areas of the US into "biodiversity" or "heritage" areas where people will not be allowed to live or work. Ultimately, this approaches crowding as many people as possible out of the rural "red" areas and into the urban blue areas. How will they all fit, you ask? Don't forget that population control has been another globalist hobby horse. And population reduction. Check this link to a recent Sarah Foster/WND news story for a literal fulfillment of the above: 1,400 farm families are being driven from their land near Klamath Falls, OR. A huge area will be depopulated as the local economy, based on farming, disintegrates. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22718 Here's another dot to connect: it is reported that one result of the slaughter of millions of cattle in the UK will be the ruin of whole cattle raising areas. With their herds slaughtered, the farmers will have no means of staying on their land and will be driven off of it economically. This land can then be confiscated or bought up by the globalists and their surrogates and turned into further "biodiversity" preserves. Dr. Lorraine Day mentioned this on a recent Jeff Rense radio program. http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=910735 She pointed out that, unlike the mad cow disease, hoof and mouth disease is non-fatal, self limiting and has little to no chance of being transmitted harmfully to human beings. She compared it to the flu: highly contagious, but mild in its effects. So all the slaughter of these cattle has no real medical basis. My point is, we may be seeing the beginning of a new push to depopulate many sparely populated rural areas and make them off limits to human activity, while at the same time concentrating population in the more easily controllable "blue areas".
|
| | Tuesday, July 10, 2001 - 08:56 am Here's an update on the Klamath Falls water fight. The farmers of several counties have had their water shut off in the name of saving a certain species of suckerfish. http://worldnetdaily.com/frame/direct.asp?SITE=seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134315869_klamath09m.html When you read the article, look at the issues which arise. First and foremost the question is, "What is anyone going to do about it?" The federals have decreed that no water is to go to these farming counties. So, is there any effective action they can take? Some have gone and opened the floodgates, but of course TPTB soon shut them again and the farmers cannot permanently occupy and control those floodgates. Some say the only effective action is political action, but the feds are ignoring them while they dry up and blow away. Some want to have the local counties pass laws contrary to federal law, but these will soon be voided by a federal court. Some advocate violent action of various sorts, but few are willing to expose themselves to the inevitable reprisals. Some feel that publicity is the key and are organizing media events to draw attention to their plight. Their problem is the problem of all America in microcosm: they have lost political control of government and are unable to get it back by any normal means. Too much power has been centralized in Washington where it has insulated itself from those in the red zones. Whole counties can be allowed to dry up and be economically ruined and the residents do not have the political power to to do anything about it. Trying to move federal officials in Washington to take timely action is like ••••••• up a rope. Most of us have not arrived at the same point of desperation as these people: we may not like what the feds do, but it touches our daily lives in mostly bearable, indirect ways. But in Klamath Falls, the feds have passed over from frog boiling to frog gigging. This is the thorny problem we face: how to deal with the raw fact of government power, exerted against us to our detriment. The question, as always, is "What are we going to do about it?" Education, conversation and opinion are not enough. We have either got to form an effective political organization, or prepare for some form of war. Personally, I don't think we are nearly desperate enough yet. But you can see the desperation beginning to form in this article. In either case, the only answer that I can see lies in organization and working together. The nail that sticks up is going to get hammered down. If we can't organize some effective action, we are just a better fed class of slaves; the people in Russia can't do anything effective to control their government either. The feds can concentrate nearly unlimited political, financial, police and military power against any limited objective. But they can't be everywhere at once.
|
| | Thursday, July 12, 2001 - 12:07 pm Another article on the Klamath Falls water dispute: http://jewishworldreview.com/michael/kelly1.asp "Whose values govern the use of this land? Is this your land or my land? This choice is often framed as between man and beast. It is better understood as between increasingly poor and powerless (on a national scale) rural voters and increasingly rich and powerful urban-suburban voters."
|